Toward Visible-Light Photochemical CO2‑to-CH4 Conversion in Aqueous Solutions Using Sensitized Molecular Catalysis/Cyclic voltammetry in various conditions: Difference between revisions

From ChemWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|anl conc=0.5
|anl conc=0.5
|redox potential=-2.0 ,  -1.4  ;
|redox potential=-2.0 ,  -1.4  ;
|e0=4.4
|solv=Molecule:100530
|solv=Molecule:100530
|electrolyte=Molecule:100966
|electrolyte=Molecule:100966
Line 10: Line 11:
|gas=Argon
|gas=Argon
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE area=7.07
|CE=platinum
|CE=platinum
|RE=SCE
|RE=SCE
|WE area=7.07
|include=Yes
|include=Yes
}}{{Cyclic Voltammetry
}}{{Cyclic Voltammetry
Line 25: Line 26:
|cond=dark
|cond=dark
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE area=7.07
|CE=platinum
|CE=platinum
|RE=SCE
|RE=SCE
|WE area=7.07
|include=No
|include=No
}}{{Cyclic Voltammetry
}}{{Cyclic Voltammetry
Line 40: Line 41:
|cond=irr. >420, 60 min
|cond=irr. >420, 60 min
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE area=7.07
|CE=platinum
|CE=platinum
|RE=SCE
|RE=SCE
|WE area=7.07
|include=No
|include=No
}}{{Cyclic Voltammetry
}}{{Cyclic Voltammetry
Line 55: Line 56:
|cond=TEA (0.05 mM), irr. >420 nm, 1 min
|cond=TEA (0.05 mM), irr. >420 nm, 1 min
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE area=7.07
|CE=platinum
|CE=platinum
|RE=SCE
|RE=SCE
|WE area=7.07
|include=No
|include=No
}}{{Cyclic Voltammetry
}}{{Cyclic Voltammetry
Line 70: Line 71:
|cond=TEA (0.05 mM), irr. >420 nm, 60 min
|cond=TEA (0.05 mM), irr. >420 nm, 60 min
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE=glassy carbon
|WE area=7.07
|CE=platinum
|CE=platinum
|RE=SCE
|RE=SCE
|WE area=7.07
|include=No
|include=No
}}
}}
}}
}}
The results show an increase in current when the solution is irradiated and triethylamine (TEA) is added (see condition column).
The results show an increase in current when the solution is irradiated and triethylamine (TEA) is added (see condition column).

Revision as of 17:52, 17 January 2025

analyte anl conc [M] reduction potential ERed [V] oxidation potential EOx [V] *E0,0 [V] *ERed [V] *EOx [V] solvent solvent vol [ml] electrolyte electrolyte purity el conc [M] int ref comp scan rate [mV/s] scan number potential window scan dir gas T [] condition [nm] WE WE SA [mm²] CE RE Details include

[Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6]

0.5

-2.0 , -1.4

4.4

2.4, 3

MeCN

TBAPF6

0.1


100 Argon glassy carbon 7.07 platinum SCE Yes

[Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6]

0.5

-2.0, -1.4

MeCN

TBAPF6

0.1


100 CO dark glassy carbon 7.07 platinum SCE No

[Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6]

0.5

-2.0, -1.4

MeCN

TBAPF6

0.1


100 CO irr. >420, 60 min glassy carbon 7.07 platinum SCE No

[Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6]

0.5

-2.0, -1.4

MeCN

TBAPF6

0.1


100 CO TEA (0.05 mM), irr. >420 nm, 1 min glassy carbon 7.07 platinum SCE No

[Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6]

0.5

-2.0

MeCN

TBAPF6

0.1


100 CO TEA (0.05 mM), irr. >420 nm, 60 min glassy carbon 7.07 platinum SCE No

The results show an increase in current when the solution is irradiated and triethylamine (TEA) is added (see condition column).