Nickel(II) pincer complexes demonstrate that the remote substituent controls catalytic carbon dioxide reduction: Difference between revisions

From ChemWiki
publication
About
DOI 10.1039/c7cc09507d
Authors Dalton B. Burks, Shakeyia Davis, Robert W. Lamb, Xuan Liu, Roberta R. Rodrigues, Nalaka P. Liyanage, Yujie Sun, Charles Edwin Webster, Jared H. Delcamp, Elizabeth T. Papish,
Submitted 13.03.2018
Published online 2018
Licenses http://rsc.li/journals-terms-of-use#chorus,
Subjects Materials Chemistry, Metals and Alloys, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, General Chemistry, Ceramics and Composites, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Catalysis
Go to literature page
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
===Abstract===
===Abstract===
====Summary====
====Summary====
A photochemical reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to CO was shown using the nickel complexes or as catalysts in combination with the iridium-based photosensitizer {{#moleculelink:|link=NSABRUJKERBGOU-UHFFFAOYSA-N|image=false|width=300|height=200}}. Turnover numbers (TONs) of 10.6 for CO with the cobalt complex {{#moleculelink:|link=UDPGSTPOVCEDJN-UHFFFAOYSA-L|image=false|width=300|height=200}} were reached in acetonitrile. The experiments were conducted under visible-light irradiation using BIH and TEA as sacrificial electron donors (see section SEDs below).
A photochemical reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to CO was shown using the nickel complex {{#moleculelink:|link=UDPGSTPOVCEDJN-UHFFFAOYSA-L|image=false|width=300|height=200}} in comparison to the inactive derivative {{#moleculelink:|link=XLAXHWSGDXWDSW-UHFFFAOYSA-N|image=false|width=300|height=200}} as catalyst in combination with the iridium-based photosensitizer {{#moleculelink:|link=NSABRUJKERBGOU-UHFFFAOYSA-N|image=false|width=300|height=200}}. Turnover numbers (TONs) of 10.6 for CO with the cobalt complex {{#moleculelink:|link=UDPGSTPOVCEDJN-UHFFFAOYSA-L|image=false|width=300|height=200}} were reached in acetonitrile. The experiments were conducted under visible-light irradiation using BIH and TEA as sacrificial electron donors (see section SEDs below).
====Advances and special progress====
====Advances and special progress====
The authors showed the importance of remote substituents by a drastic change in activity through a change in a remote substituent.  
The authors showed the importance of remote substituents by a drastic change in activity through a change in a remote substituent.  

Revision as of 15:29, 22 January 2024


Abstract

Summary

A photochemical reduction of CO2 to CO was shown using the nickel complex Ni(4O(-)py)-(MeNHC)2Cl in comparison to the inactive derivative [Ni(py)-(MeNHC)2(MeCN)][PF6]2 as catalyst in combination with the iridium-based photosensitizer Ir(ppy)3. Turnover numbers (TONs) of 10.6 for CO with the cobalt complex Ni(4O(-)py)-(MeNHC)2Cl were reached in acetonitrile. The experiments were conducted under visible-light irradiation using BIH and TEA as sacrificial electron donors (see section SEDs below).

Advances and special progress

The authors showed the importance of remote substituents by a drastic change in activity through a change in a remote substituent.

Additional remarks

The designed photocatalyst could be turned on and off via (de)protonation.

Content of the published article in detail

The article contains results for the reduction of CO2 to CO under visible-light catalysis using nickel complexes as catalysts. The catalytic system performs best (referring to the TON of CO production) in acetonitrile with the cobalt catalyst Ni(4O(-)py)-(MeNHC)2Cl.

Catalyst

Ni(4O(-)py)-(MeNHC)2Cl [Ni(py)-(MeNHC)2(MeCN)][PF6]2

Photosensitizer

Ir(ppy)3

Investigation

Investigation-Name: Table 1

Sacrificial Electron Donor

In this study, the experiments were done with the sacrificial electron donors BIH (BIH) and TEA (TEA).

Additives

In this study, TfOH and proton sponge were used as additives to (de)protonate the catalytically active nickel complex. Moreover, a control experiment under nitrogen atmosphere was conducted.

Investigations