Photochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formic Acid using Ruthenium(II)-Based Catalysts and Visible Light: Difference between revisions
About |
---|
m (auto-generated) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 460: | Line 460: | ||
M V30 49 1 43 46 | M V30 49 1 43 46 | ||
M V30 50 1 43 47 | M V30 50 1 43 47 | ||
M V30 END BOND | |||
M V30 END CTAB | |||
M END | |||
</chemform><chemform smiles="C1C=CN2[Ru+2]([C-]#[O+])([H-])3(N4C=CC=CC=4C4C=CC=CN=43)N3=CC=CC=C3C=2C=1.F[P-](F)(F)(F)(F)F" inchi="1S/2C10H8N2.CO.F6P.Ru.H/c2*1-3-7-11-9(5-1)10-6-2-4-8-12-10;1-2;1-7(2,3,4,5)6;;/h2*1-8H;;;;/q;;;-1;+2;-1" inchikey="HJTHNVDYVJWKQG-UHFFFAOYSA-N" height="200px" width="300px" float="none"> | |||
-INDIGO-02262411182D | |||
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V3000 | |||
M V30 BEGIN CTAB | |||
M V30 COUNTS 35 39 0 0 0 | |||
M V30 BEGIN ATOM | |||
M V30 1 C 4.57242 -3.91012 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 2 C 6.0439 -3.90972 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 3 C 5.30956 -3.48483 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 4 N 6.0439 -4.76094 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 5 C 4.57242 -4.76476 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 6 C 5.31141 -5.18573 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 7 C 6.78059 -3.48485 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 8 C 7.51572 -2.21015 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 9 C 6.78066 -2.63382 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 10 C 8.25303 -2.6356 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 11 N 7.52081 -3.91201 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 12 C 8.2548 -3.48237 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 13 C 4.59368 -6.44014 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 14 N 6.06516 -6.43973 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 15 C 5.33081 -6.01484 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 16 C 6.06516 -7.29095 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 17 C 4.59368 -7.29477 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 18 C 5.33267 -7.71574 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 19 C 6.80206 -7.71546 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 20 C 8.27359 -7.71264 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 21 N 7.5385 -7.28895 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 22 C 8.27497 -8.56387 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 23 C 6.80346 -8.57008 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 24 C 7.54314 -8.98985 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 25 Ru 7.51415 -5.53448 0.0 0 CHG=2 | |||
M V30 26 H 8.88229 -4.57554 0.0 0 CHG=-1 | |||
M V30 27 C 8.93149 -6.24753 0.0 0 CHG=-1 | |||
M V30 28 O 9.78318 -6.7393 0.0 0 CHG=1 | |||
M V30 29 F 10.5241 -4.07553 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 30 P 11.3758 -3.58377 0.0 0 CHG=-1 | |||
M V30 31 F 12.2276 -4.07553 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 32 F 11.3758 -2.60024 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 33 F 10.5241 -3.09201 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 34 F 12.2276 -3.09201 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 35 F 11.3758 -4.5673 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 END ATOM | |||
M V30 BEGIN BOND | |||
M V30 1 2 3 1 | |||
M V30 2 2 4 2 | |||
M V30 3 1 1 5 | |||
M V30 4 1 2 3 | |||
M V30 5 2 5 6 | |||
M V30 6 1 6 4 | |||
M V30 7 1 2 7 | |||
M V30 8 2 9 7 | |||
M V30 9 2 10 8 | |||
M V30 10 1 7 11 | |||
M V30 11 1 8 9 | |||
M V30 12 2 11 12 | |||
M V30 13 1 12 10 | |||
M V30 14 2 15 13 | |||
M V30 15 2 16 14 | |||
M V30 16 1 13 17 | |||
M V30 17 1 14 15 | |||
M V30 18 2 17 18 | |||
M V30 19 1 18 16 | |||
M V30 20 1 16 19 | |||
M V30 21 2 21 19 | |||
M V30 22 2 22 20 | |||
M V30 23 1 19 23 | |||
M V30 24 1 20 21 | |||
M V30 25 2 23 24 | |||
M V30 26 1 24 22 | |||
M V30 27 10 11 25 | |||
M V30 28 10 25 21 | |||
M V30 29 10 25 14 | |||
M V30 30 10 25 4 | |||
M V30 31 10 25 26 | |||
M V30 32 10 25 27 | |||
M V30 33 3 27 28 | |||
M V30 34 1 29 30 | |||
M V30 35 1 30 31 | |||
M V30 36 1 30 32 | |||
M V30 37 1 30 33 | |||
M V30 38 1 30 34 | |||
M V30 39 1 30 35 | |||
M V30 END BOND | M V30 END BOND | ||
M V30 END CTAB | M V30 END CTAB |
Revision as of 11:18, 26 February 2024
Faulty molecule |
A molecule on this page has a mistake in its structure or is missing a part. Please edit the structure or redraw a new molecule using the replace molecule workflow.
|
Abstract
Summary
A photochemical reduction of CO2 to formic acid was shown using a system containing an iridium-based photosensitizer, ruthenium photocatalyst and triethanolamine as the electron donor. Turnover numbers up to 526 and a selectivity of 80% towards formic acid were observed if the reaction was performed with [Ir(ppy)2(bpy)]PF6 ([Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6]) as the photosensitizer and [Ru(bpy)2(Cl)(CO)]PF6 (100837) as the catalyst. The experiments were conducted under irradiation with Hg-lamp equipped with a λ=400–700 nm filter.
Advances and special progress
The employed photocatalytic system showed activity for the photoreduction of Na2CO3 to formic acid as well. A TON of 53 was observed after 5h reaction time.
Additional remarks
Experiments using different electron and proton donors such as triethylamine (TEA) and 1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide (BNAH) were unsuccessful as the observed activities were lower than those obtained in the presence of TEOA.
Content of the published article in detail
The article contains results for the reduction of CO2 to formic under visible-light catalysis using ruthenium complexes as catalysts, the iridium complex [Ir(ppy)2(bpy)]PF6 ([Ir(ppy)2(bpy)][PF6]) as a photosensitizer and triethanolamine as the electron donor. The catalytic system performs best (referring to the TON of HCOOH production) with [Ru(bpy)2(Cl)(CO)]PF6 (100837) as photocatalyst.
Catalysts
Ru(bpy)2Cl2 Ru(bpy)2CO3 [Ru(bpy)(H2O)(CO)][PF6] [Ru(bpy)2HCO][PF6]
Photosensitizer
Investigations
cat | cat conc [µM] | PS | PS conc [mM] | e-D | solvent A | . | λexc [nm] | TON CO | TON H2 | TON HCOOH | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 0.025 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 1 | 2 | 13 | ||||||
2. | 0.025 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 2 | 4 | 21 | ||||||
3. | 0.025 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 13 | 8 | 62 | ||||||
4. | 0.025 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 8 | 8 | 34 | ||||||
5. | 0.025 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 7 | 9 | 40 | ||||||
6. | 0.025 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 3 | 4 | 27 |
cat | cat conc [µM] | PS | PS conc [mM] | e-D | solvent A | . | λexc [nm] | TON CO | TON H2 | TON HCOOH | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 0.0062 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 3 | 9 | 26 | ||||||
2. | 0.0062 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 3 | 11 | 39 | ||||||
3. | 0.0062 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 19 | 19 | 117 | ||||||
4. | 0.0062 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 21 | 16 | 107 | ||||||
5. | 0.0062 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 21 | 14 | 75 | ||||||
6. | 0.0062 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 4 | 12 | 64 | ||||||
7. | 0.0031 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 36 | 33 | 296 | ||||||
8. | 0.0031 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 16 | 29 | 145 | ||||||
9. | 0.0031 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 34 | 28 | 211 | ||||||
10. | 0.0016 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 40 | 67 | 419 | ||||||
11. | 0.0016 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 25 | 62 | 225 | ||||||
12. | 0.0016 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 45 | 65 | 335 | ||||||
13. | 0.0016 | 0.025 | 400 - 700 | 4 | 44 | 75 |
analyte | reduction potential | solvent | electrolyte | . | . | WE | . | . | RE | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | 0,-2.11 | glassy carbon | Ag/AgNO3 in MeCN | ||||||||
2. | 0.45,-1.97 | glassy carbon | Ag/AgNO3 in MeCN | ||||||||
3. | 1.22,-1.75 | glassy carbon | Ag/AgNO3 in MeCN | ||||||||
4. | 1.20,-1.61 | glassy carbon | Ag/AgNO3 in MeCN |
Sacrificial electron donor
In this study, the experiments were done with the sacrificial electron donor TEOA (100507).
Additives
No additives were used in the described experiments.
Investigations
- CO2 reduction experiments (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- Optimization of concentrations (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- Table 1 (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- Table 2 (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- Table 3 - CV (Assay, Cyclic Voltammetry experiments)