Exchange Coupling Determines Metal-Dependent Efficiency for Iron- and Cobalt-Catalyzed Photochemical CO2 Reduction: Difference between revisions
From ChemWiki
publication
| About |
|---|
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
M V30 18 C 1.00836 2.13601 0.0 0 | M V30 18 C 1.00836 2.13601 0.0 0 | ||
M V30 19 Fe 0.199123 -0.451758 0.0 0 CHG=2 | M V30 19 Fe 0.199123 -0.451758 0.0 0 CHG=2 | ||
M V30 20 N 0.225271 -1.81802 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 21 C -0.479574 -2.24676 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 22 C -0.460695 -3.07155 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 23 C 0.263029 -3.46759 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 24 C 0.967873 -3.03885 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 25 C 0.948994 -2.21407 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 26 C 1.66347 -1.86344 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 27 C 2.33535 -2.34218 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 28 N 1.60783 -0.829237 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 29 C 1.90962 -1.59705 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 30 C 2.72547 -1.7196 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 31 C 3.23952 -1.07433 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 32 C 2.93773 -0.306511 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 33 C 2.12188 -0.183966 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 34 N 0.178498 2.35324 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 35 C -0.188361 2.88423 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 36 C -0.771725 3.46759 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 END ATOM | |||
M V30 BEGIN BOND | |||
M V30 1 2 1 2 | |||
M V30 2 1 2 3 | |||
M V30 3 2 3 4 | |||
M V30 4 1 4 5 | |||
M V30 5 2 5 6 | |||
M V30 6 1 6 1 | |||
M V30 7 1 5 7 | |||
M V30 8 2 7 8 | |||
M V30 9 1 8 9 | |||
M V30 10 2 9 10 | |||
M V30 11 1 10 11 | |||
M V30 12 2 11 12 | |||
M V30 13 1 12 7 | |||
M V30 14 1 9 13 | |||
M V30 15 2 13 14 | |||
M V30 16 1 14 15 | |||
M V30 17 2 15 16 | |||
M V30 18 1 16 17 | |||
M V30 19 2 17 18 | |||
M V30 20 1 18 13 | |||
M V30 21 2 20 21 | |||
M V30 22 1 21 22 | |||
M V30 23 2 22 23 | |||
M V30 24 1 23 24 | |||
M V30 25 2 24 25 | |||
M V30 26 1 25 20 | |||
M V30 27 10 4 19 | |||
M V30 28 10 8 19 | |||
M V30 29 10 14 19 | |||
M V30 30 10 20 19 | |||
M V30 31 1 25 26 | |||
M V30 32 1 15 26 | |||
M V30 33 1 26 27 | |||
M V30 34 2 28 29 | |||
M V30 35 1 29 30 | |||
M V30 36 2 30 31 | |||
M V30 37 1 31 32 | |||
M V30 38 2 32 33 | |||
M V30 39 1 33 28 | |||
M V30 40 1 29 26 | |||
M V30 41 10 28 19 | |||
M V30 42 3 34 35 | |||
M V30 43 1 35 36 | |||
M V30 44 10 34 19 | |||
M V30 END BOND | |||
M V30 END CTAB | |||
M END | |||
</chemform> <chemform smiles="C1C=C2C3C=CC=C4C5C=CC=C6C7(C8C=CC=CN=8[Co+2](N#CC)(N8C7=CC=CC=8)(N=56)(N=34)N2=CC=1)C" inchi="1S/C27H21N5.C2H3N.Co/c1-27(24-14-3-6-18-29-24,25-15-4-7-19-30-25)26-16-9-13-23(32-26)22-12-8-11-21(31-22)20-10-2-5-17-28-20;1-2-3;/h2-19H,1H3;1H3;/q;;+2" inchikey="GEWRDVXFGQMHJL-UHFFFAOYSA-N" height="200px" width="300px" float="none"> | |||
-INDIGO-11172400032D | |||
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V3000 | |||
M V30 BEGIN CTAB | |||
M V30 COUNTS 36 44 0 0 0 | |||
M V30 BEGIN ATOM | |||
M V30 1 C -3.23952 -0.911479 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 2 C -2.79762 -1.64865 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 3 C -1.93826 -1.63453 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 4 N -1.52081 -0.883244 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 5 C -1.96271 -0.146077 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 6 C -2.82207 -0.160195 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 7 C -1.54526 0.605208 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 8 N -0.685901 0.619325 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 9 C -0.268449 1.37061 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 10 C -0.710354 2.10778 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 11 C -1.56971 2.09366 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 12 C -1.98716 1.34238 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 13 C 0.59091 1.38473 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 14 N 1.03281 0.647561 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 15 C 1.89217 0.661678 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 16 C 2.30963 1.41296 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 17 C 1.86772 2.15013 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 18 C 1.00836 2.13601 0.0 0 | |||
M V30 19 Co 0.199123 -0.451758 0.0 0 CHG=2 | |||
M V30 20 N 0.225271 -1.81802 0.0 0 | M V30 20 N 0.225271 -1.81802 0.0 0 | ||
M V30 21 C -0.479574 -2.24676 0.0 0 | M V30 21 C -0.479574 -2.24676 0.0 0 | ||
Revision as of 00:03, 17 November 2024
Abstract
Summary
A photochemical reduction of CO2 to CO was shown using an Fe2+ and Co2+ complexes as catalysts in combination with Ruxx as photosensitizer.
metal−ligand exchange coupling as an example of charge delocalization that can determine the efficiency for photocatalytic CO2RR. A comparative evaluation of iron and cobalt complexes supported by the redox-active ligand tpyPY2Me establishes that the two-electron reduction of [Co(tpyPY2Me)]2+ ([Co]2+) occurs at potentials 770 mV more negative than the [Fe(tpyPY2Me)]2+ ([Fe]2+) analogue by maximizing the exchange coupling in the latter compound.
Advances and special progress
Additional remarks
Content of the published article in detail
Catalysts tested in this study
Photosensitizer
Investigation
Experiment 'Exchange Coupling Determines Metal-Dependent Efficiency for Iron- and Cobalt-Catalyzed Photochemical CO2 Reduction/Comparison of Fe and Co complexes' does not exist.
Further Information
The Supporting Information gives quantum yields for described experiments in Table 1.
Sacrificial electron donor
In this study, the experiments were done with the sacrificial electron donor BIH (100508).
Additives
Investigations
- CO2 Reduction under diverse conditions with diverse sensitizers (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- Iron-Catalyzed Photochemical CO2 Reduction under diverse conditions (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- Iron-Catalyzed Photochemical CO2 Reduction under diverse conditions error (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- Table 2 Co catalyst testing (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- Table 2 Conversion with Co catalyst (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- Table 2 conversion with Co catalyst (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
- testtest2 (Molecular process, Photocatalytic CO2 conversion experiments)
